How is it possible for some people to actually spend more time talking than breathing?
Question by Mike: How is it possible for some people to actually spend more time talking than breathing?
I work with someone who, I kid you not, can literally talk for HOURS without pausing for a single moment of silence.
It’s like a stream of consciousness, and no matter how serious or trivial the concept is, she lets it fly, and doesn’t give a second thought as to whether it actually needs to be said.
I suppose one could defend it as ADHD, or a serious personality disorder such as narcissism. My belief is that it is a stunning level of selfishness and immaturity.
What are the reasons for someone blurting out every thought in their head?
Best answer:
Answer by SA
no trust me my whole family is full of chatterboxes (I’m not) like certain people like my mom, brothers, and aunts and uncles. That’s just their personality.
What do you think? Answer below!
JVZoo Product Feed
Categories: News Tags: breathing, people, talking, possible, some, than, more, spend, actually, time
Q&A: Why do we spend more money each year looking for cancer treatments and way less money to try and prevent it?
Question by rdgx3: Why do we spend more money each year looking for cancer treatments and way less money to try and prevent it?
Best answer:
Answer by Krazy
If we found the cure we woudnt have to spend money on prevention and this will save money in the long term.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
JVZoo Product Feed
Q&A: How is it possible for some people to actually spend more time talking than breathing?
Question by Mike: How is it possible for some people to actually spend more time talking than breathing?
I work with someone who, I kid you not, can literally talk for HOURS without pausing for a single moment of silence.
It’s like a stream of consciousness, and no matter how serious or trivial the concept is, she lets it fly, and doesn’t give a second thought as to whether it actually needs to be said.
I suppose one could defend it as ADHD, or a serious personality disorder such as narcissism. My belief is that it is a stunning level of selfishness and immaturity.
What are the reasons for someone blurting out every thought in their head?
Best answer:
Answer by Arc
I know what you mean… Sometimes I’m even amazed at how much they can talk without tiring themselves, I also know a couple of people who can talk rapidly, almost without a pause between words and they rarely give you the opportunity to talk back. I asked a friend once why she’s so talkative and it turns out that she’s pretty lonely and doesn’t have anyone to talk to in her house.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
JVZoo Product Feed
Categories: News Tags: breathing, people, talking, possible, some, than, more, spend, actually, time
Why are we more interested in Paris than clever women who spend their lives trying to find cures for cancer?
Question by a mouse is not a hotel: Why are we more interested in Paris than clever women who spend their lives trying to find cures for cancer?
Best answer:
Answer by ashlee_nicole33
Simply put: many women are just so stupid.
Also, there have been many female celebrities that have been involved in worthwhile causes – Audrey Hepburn, Reese Witherspoon, etc. Why they don’t make magazine covers (obviously not Audrey), I’ll never know.
Give your answer to this question below!
JVZoo Product Feed
Strategies to Renovate Your Property With Out Having to Spend a Fortune
Strategies to Renovate Your Property With Out Having to Spend a Fortune
Article by Rueben Hird
In recent times there has been an a huge growth in the degree of DIY renovations all around the property market. All these forms of improvements will encompass different sorts of household works like an outside face-lift using a well picked out coat of paint, putting in an absolutely new kitchen, putting in new tiles in the bathroom, varnishing your floors or extending the proportions of your property by adding new rooms.
You will instantly find that some of the home renovation work all around your property are a lot simpler than you may imagine, and for this reason you could choose to do a large amount of the work yourself and save considerable cash. Alternately, you can do a number of the little tasks and then bring a competent trades person in to finish the most difficult jobs. But realize that you will have to be nearby to preside over them and to manage every one so that the complete process is executed with out a problem and on time.
In case you get a home renovation job done by a professional tradesman you’ ll find that the biggest part of the expense consists of labour. As a consequence if you have got a bit of insight then you’ ll have the capacity to do the work on your own and save money on your own renovations. You’ ll at the same time have the extra advantage of ensuring that you get the work concluded safely, on time and with as little anxiety as is possible.
Rejuvenating older real estate comes complete with its very own problems and complexities. For instance you have got to be really observant when conducting a renovation on houses that are over thirty years old as there is a chance that asbestos had been used in the building of the apartment or house. This is very pertinent and you will need to be mindful of the potential dangers related to raw materials that are made with asbestos. In any case if you are in two minds about whether or not your property has asbestos located in it then it is possible to perhaps get a qualified examination performed or easily engage the resources of an asbestos removal business to discard it carefully and reliably.
Whenever you do your own enquiries and organize your self correclty you will have the ability to perform more or less any home improvement task. Various helpful guidelines can go a long way to assisting you in making your place appear absolutely fabulous while not being required to spend a an arm and a leg.
About the Author
Rueben writes for ideas to save money which includes FREE asbestos info safety and removal, bathroom home renovation ideas and home renovation design savings.
JVZoo Product Feed
The Senate is going to spend 50 Billion on Aids-21,78,and 97 times that of cancer, heart, stroke?
Question by Political Hack: Finishing School: The Senate is going to spend 50 Billion on Aids-21,78,and 97 times that of cancer, heart, stroke?
proportional to the respective death rates-This is your Democrats at work for you.
(In the NY Post)
Best answer:
Answer by Lives7
Yet, the Democrats will NOT even consider working to relieve the gas prices at the pumps for the “Working Class” voters.
How stupid are they?!
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
JVZoo Product Feed
How many maximum days a patient can spend before starting chemotherapy and after the breast cancer surgery ?
Question by Parthiv: How many maximum days a patient can spend before starting chemotherapy and after the breast cancer surgery ?
I would like to know that how urgent is the chemotherapy after the breast cancer surgery. The patient is 51 yr of age lady and has a Stage-III tumor (3.5×3.5x3cm) which was removed by MRM. and what are the precautions to be taken while, during and after the chemotherapy. The patient also has Hyper tension and is diabetic.
Best answer:
Answer by Nurse For 20 Years
Every doctor is different on their opinion on when to start chemo. The doctor is also the person that you need to speak to about your chemo questions. That is the person to trust for accurate information, not any strangers here. This is someones life you’re talking about. Go to the right source.
Add your own answer in the comments!
JVZoo Product Feed
Categories: News Tags: patient, breast, many, days, chemotherapy, spend, starting, after, cancer, maximum
Why do we spend so much more money on breast cancer research than other forms?
Question by wolf n dolphin beals: Why do we spend so much more money on breast cancer research than other forms?
I just read several articles about cancer deaths and found that far more men die of prostate cancer than women die of breast cancer. Also, men are much more likely to get this cancer than women get breast cancer.
Everywhere we look (on TV, radio, bumper stickers) we see pink.
Even with all the hubbub about tobacco causing deaths, we don’t spend nearly as much money on lung cancer research etc.
Why is there such a disparity?
Oh, I was also wondering if it might help to start making brown ribbons to raise awareness to Prostate Cancer! ;-P
Best answer:
Answer by cece
I’M REALLY NOT SURE, BUT THE WAY I SEE IT IS..IF YOU GET CANCER FROM TOBACCO IT WAS A CHOICE.BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE CHOICE OF SMOKING OR NOT! BUT YOU DON’T CHOOSE BREAST CANCER
Give your answer to this question below!
JVZoo Product Feed
Categories: News Tags: cancer, how much money cancer research money do we need, research, money, more, spend, forms, much, breast, than
Q&A: Is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
Question by Walter Richard: Is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
we all know about it, some of us might even be affected by it through ourselves or loved ones, but ask yourselves this. Is it really worth it for us the people of the world both governments and private donors to give there money, our money to these breast, lung cancer & etc “research groups” including the aids/HIV types who we “donate” and fund too like they can “GUARANTEE A CURE”, even though (as evident by the past and today’s current status regarding these things) other than CHEST RIPPING surgeries and the side(“SAD”) effects of chemotherapy (&etc) they really cant! all i ask compassionately from you people is don’t think about cash hungry researchers who ask you to donate money to their c(ars)ause (excluding the non-profit ones who weather or not they find a cure are doing what they do “pro-bono”) think about yourselves, think about the people affected by these things, put some thought and question thyself the next time you encourage your government or yourselves to donate money to “False Profits” ask and realize what do you REALLY want, what are you REALLY paying for and is it WORTH it
P.S. i have a Feeling some of you if not all (lol) will say “oh but the money we donate doesn’t go to their luxuries it goes to the resources necessary to conduct research like per-say the electric bill to keep the lights on or the gas bill to run the heat after all what goods a laboratory if jack Frost beats up everybody in it. Oh and then we got the main courses such as whatever resources and materials the scientist try to make a cure out of, billions of dollars in (anti HIV/Aids hope)”donations” nothing (substantial) yet but at least they tried, then we got the volunteers the test subjects the people who volunteer for free or get paid just small amount of cash to do the things them donation hungry scientist are not willing to risk there overpaid lives to do themselves. oh and that leaves the most important “non-profit” but yet “research related cost” these scientist spend money on.. yes you got it, themselves so either way either as long as there donors who are promised a lot, but returned only little (keep in mind its not like these research people are just way too lazy to find a cure its just that as far as the world knows today the “Cure” is maybe possibly not impossible its just currently non-existent.) these scientist and “research groups” (excluding the ones who are TRULY non-profit as in they don’t even intend to make enough of a living to feed there families off it let alone their other personal desires) will always Find money to Fund their “C(ars)ause”
okay it might confuse others on what i think about this so here goes what i really meant to say from my stand point is that i Feel research groups who are trying to find cures for aids/HIV and etc should only be Paid if there research and capabilities to Provide one actually pays off for the people of the world who are affected by them. i didn’t mean screw research and let these people die no of course not i really meant research groups that accept donations to fund their cure finding projects for example medicinal and research companies that take a boat load of tax payer funded money per year so they can try to find a cure like for aids/HIV (a good real life example of what I’m talking about) should return back it back to the people say every net gross year they are unable to provide one regardless of whatever time and resources they put in themselves. Ok folks so that is what i really meant to say if you think about it it makes perfect sense and if you are one of those people donating money to them you’d Feel the same way too
Best answer:
Answer by DPIC
well… the tax payers paid for this too 
★★★┏━┳┳┳┳━┳┳┓★★★
★★★┃ㅁ┃↓┃┃←┫↑┫★★★
★★★┗┓┣━┻┻━┻┻┛★★★
★★★★┗┛★★★★★★★★★★
★★┏━━┓★★★★★★★★★★
★★┃┣━╋━┳━┳━┳━┓★★
★★┣━┫┃←┫ㅁ┃ㅁ┃┗┫★★
★★┗━━┻━┻━┫┏┻━┛★★
★★★★★★★★★┗┛★★★★★
Add your own answer in the comments!
JVZoo Product Feed
is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
Question by hjlk: is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
we all know about it, some of us might even be affected by it through ourselves or loved ones, but ask yourselves this. Is it really worth it for us the people of the world both governments and private donors to give there money, our money to these breast, lung cancer & etc “research groups” including the aids/HIV types who we “donate” and fund too like they can “GUARANTEE A CURE”, even though (as evident by the past and today’s current status regarding these things) other than CHEST RIPPING surgeries and the side(“SAD”) effects of chemotherapy (&etc) they really cant! all i ask compassionately from you people is don’t think about cash hungry researchers who ask you to donate money to their c(ars)ause (excluding the non-profit ones who weather or not they find a cure are doing what they do “pro-bono”) think about yourselves, think about the people affected by these things, put some thought and question thyself the next time you encourage your government or yourselves to donate money to “False Profits” ask and realize what do you REALLY want, what are you REALLY paying for and is it WORTH it
P.S. i have a Feeling some of you if not all (lol) will say “oh but the money we donate doesn’t go to their luxuries it goes to the resources necessary to conduct research like per-say the electric bill to keep the lights on or the gas bill to run the heat after all what goods a laboratory if jack Frost beats up everybody in it. Oh and then we got the main courses such as whatever resources and materials the scientist try to make a cure out of, billions of dollars in (anti HIV/Aids hope)”donations” nothing (substantial) yet but at least they tried, then we got the volunteers the test subjects the people who volunteer for free or get paid just small amount of cash to do the things them donation hungry scientist are not willing to risk there overpaid lives to do themselves. oh and that leaves the most important “non-profit” but yet “research related cost” these scientist spend money on.. yes you got it, themselves so either way either as long as there donors who are promised a lot, but returned only little (keep in mind its not like these research people are just way too lazy to find a cure its just that as far as the world knows today the “Cure” is maybe possibly not impossible its just currently non-existent.) these scientist and “research groups” (excluding the ones who are TRULY non-profit as in they don’t even intend to make enough of a living to feed there families off it let alone their other personal desires) will always Find money to Fund their “C(ars)ause”
oh & another P.S. if there is anybody that agrees with me and thinks its not worth it please say so if there is anybody with enough evidence to disagree or criticize me please do so but in a civil way por-favor i don’t want any nut-job cursing at me oh and one more thing if anybody has an idea in between Feel Free to bring it up thank you and goodnight (or day if otherwise)
okay what i really meant to say from my stand point is that i Feel research groups who are trying to find cures for aids/HIV and etc should only be Paid if there research and capabilities to Provide one actually pays off for the people of the world who are affected by them. i didn’t mean screw research and let these people die no of course not i really meant research groups that accept donations to fund there cure finding projects for example medicinal and research companies that take a boat load of tax payer funded money per year so they can try to find a cure like for aids/HIV (a good real life example of what I’m talking about) should return back it back to the people say every net gross year they are unable to provide one regardless of whatever time and resources they put in themselves. Ok folks so that is what i really meant to say if you think about it it makes perfect sense and if you are one of those people donating money to them you’d Feel the same way too
Best answer:
Answer by tehabwa
I gather you don’t think saving lives and preventing suffering are worthwhile things to do. Every HUMAN on the planet disagrees with you about this.
Cancer USED to be a death sentence; there was NOTHING that anyone could do. The person who got cancer got sicker and sicker until they died.
Now, there are a LOT of people who live for years, even decades, after being treated for cancer. There are more and better treatment options all the time.
There’s no reason to assume things won’t continue improving.
????? “Cash hungry” — the people who actually do the research do NOT get rich from it. (Why you think researchers’ families should starve is unclear to us HUMANS).
If you have or get cancer, you don’t HAVE to seek treatment that would prolong your life. Insisting that NO ONE get treatment to prolong THEIR lives isn’t YOUR call.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
JVZoo Product Feed
Is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
Question by hjlk: Is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
we all know about it, some of us might even be affected by it through ourselves or loved ones, but ask yourselves this. Is it really worth it for us the people of the world both governments and private donors to give there money, our money to these breast, lung cancer & etc “research groups” including the aids/HIV types who we “donate” and fund too like they can “GUARANTEE A CURE”, even though (as evident by the past and today’s current status regarding these things) other than CHEST RIPPING surgeries and the side(“SAD”) effects of chemotherapy (&etc) they really cant! all i ask compassionately from you people is don’t think about cash hungry researchers who ask you to donate money to their c(ars)ause (excluding the non-profit ones who weather or not they find a cure are doing what they do “pro-bono”) think about yourselves, think about the people affected by these things, put some thought and question thyself the next time you encourage your government or yourselves to donate money to “False Profits” ask and realize what do you REALLY want, what are you REALLY paying for and is it WORTH it
P.S. i have a Feeling some of you if not all (lol) will say “oh but the money we donate doesn’t go to their luxuries it goes to the resources necessary to conduct research like per-say the electric bill to keep the lights on or the gas bill to run the heat after all what goods a laboratory if jack Frost beats up everybody in it. Oh and then we got the main courses such as whatever resources and materials the scientist try to make a cure out of, billions of dollars in (anti HIV/Aids hope)”donations” nothing (substantial) yet but at least they tried, then we got the volunteers the test subjects the people who volunteer for free or get paid just small amount of cash to do the things them donation hungry scientist are not willing to risk there overpaid lives to do themselves. oh and that leaves the most important “non-profit” but yet “research related cost” these scientist spend money on.. yes you got it, themselves so either way either as long as there donors who are promised a lot, but returned only little (keep in mind its not like these research people are just way too lazy to find a cure its just that as far as the world knows today the “Cure” is maybe possibly not impossible its just currently non-existent.) these scientist and “research groups” (excluding the ones who are TRULY non-profit as in they don’t even intend to make enough of a living to feed there families off it let alone their other personal desires) will always Find money to Fund their “C(ars)ause”
okay it might confuse others on what i think about this so here goes what i really meant to say from my stand point is that i Feel research groups who are trying to find cures for aids/HIV and etc should only be Paid if there research and capabilities to Provide one actually pays off for the people of the world who are affected by them. i didn’t mean screw research and let these people die no of course not i really meant research groups that accept donations to fund their cure finding projects for example medicinal and research companies that take a boat load of tax payer funded money per year so they can try to find a cure like for aids/HIV (a good real life example of what I’m talking about) should return it back to the people say every net gross year they are unable to provide one regardless of whatever time and resources they put in themselves. Ok folks so that is what i really meant to say if you think about it it makes perfect sense and if you are one of those people donating money to them you’d Feel the same way too
one more P.S. if there is anybody that agrees with me please say so if there is anybody with enough evidence to disagree or criticize me please do so but in a civil way por-favor i don’t want any nut-job cursing at me oh and one more thing if anybody has an idea in between Feel Free to bring it up thank you and goodnight (or day if otherwise: )
Best answer:
Answer by Ben
Money is a great motivator. Cut back on the funding and you slow down the development of new treatments. The world doesn’t revolve on volunteerism.
Add your own answer in the comments!
JVZoo Product Feed
Q&A: Is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
Question by hjlk: Is it REALLY WORTH IT for taxpayers and private donors to spend money on “Research”?
we all know about it, some of us might even be affected by it through ourselves or loved ones, but ask yourselves this. Is it really worth it for us the people of the world both governments and private donors to give there money, our money to these breast, lung cancer & etc “research groups” including the aids/HIV types who we “donate” and fund too like they can “GUARANTEE A CURE”, even though (as evident by the past and today’s current status regarding these things) other than CHEST RIPPING surgeries and the side(“SAD”) effects of chemotherapy (&etc) they really cant! all i ask compassionately from you people is don’t think about cash hungry researchers who ask you to donate money to their c(ars)ause (excluding the non-profit ones who weather or not they find a cure are doing what they do “pro-bono”) think about yourselves, think about the people affected by these things, put some thought and question thyself the next time you encourage your government or yourselves to donate money to “False Profits” ask and realize what do you REALLY want, what are you REALLY paying for and is it WORTH it
P.S. i have a Feeling some of you if not all (lol) will say “oh but the money we donate doesn’t go to their luxuries it goes to the resources necessary to conduct research like per-say the electric bill to keep the lights on or the gas bill to run the heat after all what goods a laboratory if jack Frost beats up everybody in it. Oh and then we got the main courses such as whatever resources and materials the scientist try to make a cure out of, billions of dollars in (anti HIV/Aids hope)”donations” nothing (substantial) yet but at least they tried, then we got the volunteers the test subjects the people who volunteer for free or get paid just small amount of cash to do the things them donation hungry scientist are not willing to risk there overpaid lives to do themselves. oh and that leaves the most important “non-profit” but yet “research related cost” these scientist spend money on.. yes you got it, themselves so either way either as long as there donors who are promised a lot, but returned only little (keep in mind its not like these research people are just way too lazy to find a cure its just that as far as the world knows today the “Cure” is maybe possibly not impossible its just currently non-existent.) these scientist and “research groups” (excluding the ones who are TRULY non-profit as in they don’t even intend to make enough of a living to feed there families off it let alone their other personal desires) will always Find money to Fund their “C(ars)ause”
okay it might confuse others on what i think about this so here goes what i really meant to say from my stand point is that i Feel research groups who are trying to find cures for aids/HIV and etc should only be Paid if there research and capabilities to Provide one actually pays off for the people of the world who are affected by them. i didn’t mean screw research and let these people die no of course not i really meant research groups that accept donations to fund their cure finding projects for example medicinal and research companies that take a boat load of tax payer funded money per year so they can try to find a cure like for aids/HIV (a good real life example of what I’m talking about) should return it back to the people say every net gross year they are unable to provide one regardless of whatever time and resources they put in themselves. Ok folks so that is what i really meant to say if you think about it it makes perfect sense and if you are one of those people donating money to them you’d Feel the same way too
one more P.S. if there is anybody that agrees with me please say so if there is anybody with enough evidence to disagree or criticize me please do so but in a civil way por-favor i don’t want any nut-job cursing at me oh and one more thing if anybody has an idea in between Feel Free to bring it up thank you and goodnight (or day if otherwise: )
Best answer:
Answer by Daniel H
In the shortest way possible, I disagree. The crucial issue with your idea is that every year, there is not money left over. It gets spent. The research that goes into drugs is absolutely astronomical. Theoretically this would be a fantastic way to ensure that the researchers were pushed to the limits of their abilities, but this would not ever work.
On the other hand, I do understand why your feel so strongly about this. It is easy to look to the examples of NPOs that fall victim to perverse incentives but simply put the vast majority of research firms do amazing work. Breakthroughs do not happen overtime in the medical field.
I am not saying here that there is no deadweight loss in the research sector because there certainly is; however, I just do not see how this type of annual refund system would allow these organizations to get any work done.
Give your answer to this question below!
JVZoo Product Feed
